Purpose: To evaluate hard and soft tissue response and mechanical integrity for screw-retained layered zirconia crowns bonded to titanium nitride–coated titanium (TiN) CAD/CAM abutments supported by implants at 1- and 2-year followups.
Materials and Methods: A total of 46 patients were restored with a total of 102 free-standing implant-supported layered zirconia crowns, which were bonded to their respective abutments in the dental laboratory and delivered as a one-piece screw-retained crown. Baseline, 1-year, and 2-year data were collated on pocket probing depth, bleeding on probing, marginal bone levels, and mechanical complications.
Results: Of the 46 patients, 4 patients with one implant each were not followed-up. These patients were not included in the analysis. Of the remaining 98 implants, due to failed appointments during the global pandemic, soft tissue measurements were recorded for 94 implants at year 1 and 86 implants at year 2, with a mean buccal/lingual pocket probing depth of 1.80/1.95 mm and 2.09/2.17 mm, respectively. Mean bleeding on probing was 0.50 and 0.53 at 1 and 2 years, which represents somewhere between no bleeding and a spot bleed according to the study protocol. Radiographic data were available for 74 implants at year 1 and 86 implants at year 2. The mean marginal bone change from baseline was +0.11 mm mesially and +0.19 mm distally at 1 year and +0.24 mm mesially and +0.16 mm distally at 2 years. The final bone level with respect to the reference point was +0.49 mm mesially and +0.19 mm distally at the end of the study period. Mechanical complications involving a slight misfit of the crown margin were recorded for one unit (1%), porcelain fracture for 16 units (16%), and a loss of preload for 12 units (12%) of < 5 Ncm (< 20% of initial preload).
Conclusion: The biologic and mechanical stability of ceramic crowns bonded to CAD/ CAM screw-retained abutments using angulated screw access was considered to be high, with overall bone gain, excellent soft tissue health, and only limited mechanical complications related to generally small fractures of the porcelain and a clinically insignificant loss of preload. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:37–45. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9856