Guided dental implant surgery can optimize implant placement positioning, increase predictability, and decrease surgical invasiveness through flapless techniques. Static surgical guides have been used to accomplish this task, though limitations of patient opening and lack of coolant contact with the surgical site have been clinically significant weaknesses. Technologic advances have allowed robotically guided implant placement using haptic guidance. The absence of a static stereolithographic guide over the surgical area allows for optimal access and adequate cooling during osteotomies. The aim of this case series was to present the workflows of both static and robotic guidance in the same patient and measure deviations from the presurgical planning software to determine the practicability and accuracy of robotic guidance. Based on this case series, it can be concluded that using robotically assisted implant surgery can yield deviation results that are comparable to static CAD/CAM stereolithographic surgical guides. Robotic surgery can be performed predictably with minimal deviation in both simple and complex clinical situations. Further testing and analysis are needed to confirm this case study's results in a larger cohort of patients. Keywords: accuracy, dental implant, guided, robotic, static