We use cookies to enable the functions required for this website, such as login or a shopping cart. You can find more information in our privacy policy.
Degree in Medicine and Surgery at the University of Bologna in 1978. Degree of Medicine Dentaire (L.M.D.) at the University of Geneva in 1981. Specialization in Stomatology and Dental Prosthesis at the University of Bologna in 1984. Former Visiting Professor in Fixed Prosthesis at the Dental School of the University of Bologna from 1986 to 1994. Former Visiting Professor of Restorative Dentistry at the Dental School of the University of Siena. He is the Past-President of the Italian Academy of Restorative Dentistry, the past President of the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry, Active Member of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry, and former Associated Member of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry. He is author of many scientific articles published on international journals, of a chapter in a book of Endodontics and co-author of some books on Adhesive Dentistry. Gold metal of the Geneva University (J.L. Baume prize) in 2008. He limits his activity to Restorative Dentistry within a group practice in Bologna.
1st Edition 2001 Book Hardcover, 264 pages, 474 illus Language: English Categories: Restorative Dentistry, Prosthodontics Stock No.: 4541 ISBN 978-0-86715-402-3 QP USA
£69.00£2.00
Events
41st AIOP Int. Congress
Doctor, how long is my prostheses going to last?” Clinical and technical risk factor analysis and preventions of complications17. Nov 2022 — 19. Nov 2022Palazzo dei Congressi Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Speakers: Nitzan Bichacho, Valter Bolognesi, Maura Bracci, Domenico Cascione, Christer Dahlin, David De Franco, Riccardo Del Lupo, Mirela Feraru, Guido Fichera, Alberto Fonzar, Massimo Fuzzi, Iñaki Gamborena, Jack Goldberg, Filippo Graziani, Domenico Massironi, Konrad H. Meyenberg, Ricardo Mitrani, Stavros Pelekanos, Gianni Persichetti, Giovanni Sammarco, Salvatore Sgro, Paolo Smaniotto
Accademia Italiana di Odontoiatria Protesica (AIOP)
This author's journal articles
International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry (EN), 5/2024
SupplementPubMed ID (PMID): 38284929Pages S8-S12, Language: EnglishKoerner, Gerd / Pietrobon, Nic / Fuzzi, Massimo / De Franco, David J.
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 5/2021
DOI: 10.11607/prd.4973Pages 703-710, Language: EnglishFerrari, Marco / Marucci, Anna / Cagidiaco, Edoardo Ferrari / Pontoriero, Denise Ik / Fuzzi, Massimo
This article evaluated the sealing capacity of single crowns made of a new zirconia (Katana STML, Kuraray Noritake) when cemented with two different cement types and two different marginal preparation types. Forty intact human anterior teeth, extracted for periodontal reasons, were used. Each sample was prepared with two margin preparations: knife-edge (KE) on one half of the tooth and chamfer (CH) on the other half. Based on the type of cement used, abutments were randomly distributed into one of two groups: Group 1 used resin cement (Panavia V5, Kuraray Noritake), and Group 2 used reinforced glass-ionomer cement (FujiCEM 2, GC). A digital workflow was utilized for crown fabrication. After the cementing procedures, samples were processed, and microleakage and scanning electron microscopic observations were made. Microleakage varied significantly depending on the type of cement combination used. Group 1 samples showed less microleakage (medians: 0.76 for CH and 0.51 for KE in Group 1, and 4.1 and 3.45 for Group 2, respectively) than Group 2 specimens; the difference was statistically significant (P < .000). KE preparation showed less microleakage than CH, although no statistically significant differences were found (P < .0558). Under microscopic observations, some samples showed internal fractures within the zirconia material. KE and CH seal the margin of zirconia crowns similarly. The resin cement system ensured better adhesion than reinforced glass-ionomer cement.
Ziel: Die vorliegende Studie beurteilt das klinische Verhalten von Keramikinlays, die während des vergangenen Jahrzehnts eingegliedert wurden. Material und Methode: 182 Inlays wurden bei 66 Patienten untersucht. Das Intervall zwischen Eingliederung und Bewertung betrug im Durchschnitt 5,9 Jahre ±2,7 und reichte von 2 bis 11,7 Jahren. Zum Zeitpunkt der Evaluation wurden die Restaurationen gemäß modifizierten USPHS-Kriterien klinisch bewertet. Die statistische Analyse nach Kaplan-Meier wurde zur Feststellung der Lebensdauer verwendet. Ergebnisse: Gemäß den USPHS-Kriterien wurden gute Resultate für Farbanpassung, Randverfärbung, Sekundärkaries, Kontur und marginale Integrität erzielt. Sechs Inlays gingen verloren: vier aus endodontischen Gründen, eins wegen Sekundärkaries und ein anderes aufgrund einer Fraktur. Die Erfolgsrate der Restaurationen lag nach 11,5 Jahren bei 95 %. Schlussfolgerung: Das Fehlen von Sekundärkaries, nur leichte Veränderungen der Randverfärbung und der Farbanpassung sowie die exzellente Lebensdauer belegen, dass Keramikinlays ein ausgezeichnetes Mittel zur Restauration im Seitenzahnbereich darstellen.
Keywords: Keramikinlays, Überlebensraten, Kaplan-Meier-Analyse, modifizierte USPHS-Kriterien