Books

Purpose: To assess the prevalence and configuration of bifid (BMC) and trifid (TMC) mandibular canals using computed tomography (CT), describing the anatomical characteristics of the accessory canals, especially of the retromolar type. Materials and Methods: CT scans of 123 patients were analysed. BMCs were identified and the patterns of bifurcation were classified, including trifid canals. The width of accessory canals was measured. Retromolar canals were further classified according to their course and morphology, while their position and width were evaluated using linear measurements on CT images. Results: The majority of patients (53.6%) presented at least one BMC or TMC. 36.2% of mandibular canals were bifid, while 4.5% were trifid. The forward canals (12.6%) and retromolar canals (10.2%) were the most common among BMCs. In relation to the retromolar canals, 60% were vertical and 40% curved, with a mean width of 1.03 ± 0.28mm. Conclusion: BMCs and TMCs are common 3D radiographic findings, so that they should be considered as anatomical variations, not anomalies. Preoperative CT or CBCT evaluation should aid in identifying these variations and analysing their position and course in surgical planning. Keywords: anatomical variations, cone-beam computed tomography, mandibular canal, mandibular nerve, oral surgery, third molar