Libri correalti

This prospective, preliminary controlled clinical trial investigates the comparative effectiveness of platform-switching (PS) versus traditional butt-joint or platform-matching (PM) implant-abutment connections on peri-implant crestal bone stability. Utilizing a split mouth design, 10 systemically healthy patients (n= 20 implants) had adjacent non-restorable maxillary anterior teeth replaced with two different implants (butt-joint connections and platform-switching interfaces). Patients underwent alveolar ridge preservation, followed by implant placement: platform-matching implants were inserted at crestal bone level, and platform-switching implants were placed 1mm subcrestally. Customized Zirconia crowns were then fabricated for both systems. Outcome measures included bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), and marginal bone loss (MBL), which were evaluated through standardized periapical radiographs over 3-year timeframe. Results showed significantly higher initial MBL in the PM group (0.86 ± 0.13 mm) compared to the PS group (0.34±0.29 mm) [p value: p<0.01]. Moreover, at the three-year follow-up, the crestal bone levels remained above the implant shoulder until the third year of the study for the PS subcrestal group (PS: -0.15±0.39 mm) and slightly below the implant platform in the PM crestal group (PM: 0.55±0.19). After 3 years, the PS group also exhibited lower mean BOP percentages (12%) than the butt-joint group (17%). This study suggests that subcrestal placement with PS and internal connections can provide better long-term peri- implant bone preservation, thereby potentially improving implant success and aesthetic outcomes in the anterior maxillary region. Parole chiave: dental implant, abutment, dental implant-abutment connection, platform-switching, platform-matching, implant-supported dental prostheses, marginal bone levels

Purpose: To evaluate the preferences of dental practitioners for tooth-supported crowns dental ceramics by means of an online survey and to assess the influence of age, gender, years of experience, and dental specialty on those preferences. Materials and Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was delivered online through Google Surveys, targeting 796 dentists. It contained 17 dichotomous, closed questions with two sections. The first section dealt with general characteristics, including age, gender, years of experience, training in prosthodontics, and hours worked per week. The second section included questions regarding preferences of different materials for crowns, and the use of digital workflows. Analyses were carried out with Stata 14.0 software (StataCorp, TX, USA). A significance level of p=0.05 was adopted. Results: 248 surveys were answered. Practitioners in Chile preferred lithium disilicate for the anterior region (55.2%) but also for the posterior area (40.7%), regardless of their age, gender, years since graduation, hours worked per week or any training in prosthodontics. Chilean dentists over 50 years old considered zirconia almost 4 times more than those under 30 years old for anterior crowns (51.85%). 59.68% of dentists take digital impressions, and 37.10% have access to chairside CAD/CAM technology. In this group, 54.4% preferred feldspathic ceramic for anterior and 23.9% for posterior crowns. Conclusions: While there is a wide range of dental ceramic materials, these results provide a snapshot of the current trends in Chile where lithium disilicate is the most preferred ceramic material for tooth-supported crowns, and metal-ceramic is the least preferred material. Parole chiave: Ceramics, survey, zirconia, CAD/CAM, questionnaire

Ziel: Ziel dieser retrospektiven Fallserie war eine Längsschnittuntersuchung der Volumenveränderungen des vestibulären Weichgewebevolumens an Implantaten bezogen auf die Dicke und die Breite der keratinisierten Mukosa (DKM bzw. BKM) nach Weichgewebeaugmentation mittels Bindegewebetransplantat (BGT) und mikrochirurgischer Envelope-Technik. Material und Methoden: Bei 12 gesunden Patienten wurden 12 Implantate im Ober- oder Unterkieferseitenzahnbereich eingesetzt. Die Studie umfasste die minimalinvasive Entnahme von 12 BGT mit einer Einzelinzisionstechnik und deren Transplantation zur Augmentation des vestibulären periimplantären Weichgewebes unter Verwendung einer Envelope-Technik. Anschließend wurden die Implantate mit 12 verschraubten Keramikkronen versorgt (IPS e.max). Ergebnisse: Die Heilung verlief an allen Implantaten unauffällig und die Patienten wurden anschließend 5 Jahre nachbeobachtet. Für die DKM war in den ersten 6 postoperativen Wochen der größte Rückgang zu beobachten (von 5,50 ± 0,79 mm auf 4,59 ± 0,62 mm); anschließend sank sie nochmals leicht ab (auf 4,00 ± 0,85 mm) und blieb bis zur 2-Jahres-Nachuntersuchung stabil (bei 4,00 ± 0,36 mm). Zwischen dem zweiten und dem dritten Jahr nach der Operation nahm die DKM nochmals ab (auf 3,59 ± 0,42 mm) und blieb dann bis zum Ende des 5-jährigen Beobachtungszeitraums konstant. Die Beobachtungen zur BKM waren hiervon leicht verschieden: Die Messungen zeigten, dass die größte Abnahme in den ersten 6 Wochen stattfand (von 2,50 ± 0,42 auf 1,50 ± 0,42 mm), und die BKM anschließend bis zur 1-Jahres-Nachuntersuchung gehalten wurde. Vom ersten zum zweiten Jahr nach dem Eingriff stieg die BKM wieder an (auf 2,00 ± 0,60 mm) und blieb während der nächsten 3 Jahre gleich (bei 2,00 ± 0,85 mm). Schlussfolgerungen: Die vorliegende Untersuchung konnte die Vorteile deutlich machen, welche die Kombination aus periimplantärer Weichgewebeaugmentation mittels eines minimalinvasiv entnommenen BGT und der mikrochirurgischen Envelope-Technik über einen Zeitraum von 5 Jahren bietet. Parole chiave: Bindegewebetransplantat, Envelope-Technik, Implantologie, Mikrochirurgie, periimplantäres Weichgewebe

Aim: The aim of the present retrospective case series was to longitudinally assess soft tissue volume changes on the vestibular aspect of implants in relation to keratinized mucosa thickness (KMT) and width (KMW) after the application of the microsurgical envelope technique combined with a connective tissue graft (CTG). Materials and methods: A total of 12 healthy patients received 12 dental implants placed either in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The study involved the harvesting of 12 CTGs with a minimally invasive single-incision technique, grafted to the vestibular peri-implant soft tissue utilizing the envelope technique, followed by the insertion of 12 screw-retained IPS e.max crowns. Results: The healing process was uneventful across all areas, and all patients were followed up for a period of 5 years. The evaluation of KMT showed the highest decrease in the first 6 weeks after surgery (5.5 ± 0.79 to 4.59 ± 0.62 mm), then dropped slightly to 4 ± 0.85 mm, after which it maintained at 4 ± 0.36 mm until the 2-year time point. Between the second and third years after surgery, a further decrease of 3.59 ± 0.42 mm was recorded for KMT, which then remained constant until the end of the 5-year research period. The observations regarding KMW were slightly different, with the measurements demonstrating the greatest decrease in first 6 weeks (from 2.5 ± 0.42 to 1.5 ± 0.42 mm), which was maintained until the 1-year time point. Between the first and second years after surgery, the KMW increased to 2 ± 0.60 mm and remained level for the next 3 years, at 2 ± 0.85 mm. Conclusions: The current research demonstrated the advantages of using a combination of a minimally invasively harvested CTG and the microsurgical envelope technique for a duration of 5 years. Parole chiave: connective tissue graft, envelope technique, implantology, microsurgery, peri-implant soft tissue

Digital dentistry has contributed to the evolution and simplification of dental implantology over the last decade. The incorporation of intraoral scanners, CBCT, 3D implant-planning software, and CAD/CAM systems makes prosthetically driven implantology a straightforward process. Such digital resources for treatment planning and execution, following evidence-based concepts, have the ability to improve the long-term esthetics and function of implant-supported restorations as well the long-term survival of dental implants. Dental implants are frequently considered as the first treatment option for replacing failing or missing teeth. However, their use in the esthetic zone remains a challenge for many clinicians. The present article provides clinical guidelines for ideal implant positioning employing computer-guided surgery and chairside CAD/CAM-fabricated provisional and definitive restorations with titanium (Ti)-bases for successful prosthetic outcomes, optimizing gingival architecture, and decreasing overall treatment duration. (Int J Comput Dent 2023;26(1):75–0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818287) Parole chiave: Dental implant, implant restoration, chairside, CAD/CAM, titanium base, implant position, immediate provisional, guided implant surgery

Background and aim: Dental implant patients are frequently required to undergo a second-stage/uncovery procedure to expose the implant fixture. The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the vestibular split rolling flap (VSRF) versus the double door mucoperiosteal flap (DDMF) techniques at adjacent posterior implant sites during the second-stage procedure. Materials and methods: A total of 44 uncovered posterior dental implants in 10 healthy patients were treated at the second stage. All the mesial implants were assigned to the VSRF technique (group A) and the distal implants to the DDMF technique (group B). Soft tissue measurements were performed as vestibular keratinized mucosal width (KMW) and vestibular mucosal thickness (MT) over a period of 1 year, assessed at four different intervals. Results: Healing was uneventful at all sites. There were no patient dropouts in the entire study time frame. The clinical comparison of the adjacent implants showed overall higher MT measurements at 12 months for group A (2.5 ± 0.2 mm) compared with group B (1.00 ± 0.3 mm), and for KMW measurements for group A (2.5 ± 0.2 mm) compared with group B (2.0 ± 0.3 mm). Conclusions: The VSRF technique described in the present article is a reliable method for performing an implant uncovery. If the technique is applied according to the indication and with a minimally invasive protocol, it is preferable to other conventional exposure techniques due to its ability to provide enhanced soft tissue volume around the implant, which can in turn benefit the health, esthetics, function, and long-term stability of the peri-implant tissue.

Hintergrund und Ziel: In vielen Fällen ist nach einer Implantation ein zweiter Eingriff zur Freilegung der Implantatfixtur notwendig. Ziel der vorliegenden prospektiven Studie war ein Vergleich der klinischen Ergebnisse bei Anwendung folgender Freilegungstechniken an benachbarten Seitenzahnimplantaten: vestibulärer Teilschicht-Rolllappen (vestibular split rolling flap, VSRF) und Doppeltür-Mukoperiostlappen (double door mucoperiosteal flap, DDMF). Material und Methoden: Insgesamt 44 gedeckt eingeheilte Implantate bei 10 gesunden Patienten wurden bei einem Zweiteingriff freigelegt. Die jeweils mesialen Implantate wurden der VSRF-Technik (Gruppe A), die distalen der DDMF-Technik (Gruppe B) zugeteilt. Zur Bewertung des Weichgewebes wurden während eines Jahres an vier Zeitpunkten die Breite der vestibulären keratinisierten Mukosa (KMB) und die Dicke der vestibulären Mukosa (MD) gemessen. Ergebnisse: Die Heilung verlief an allen Implantaten unauffällig. Während der gesamten Studiendauer gab es keine Studienabbrüche. Im klinischen Vergleich der benachbarten Implantate ergaben sich nach 12 Monaten höhere MD-Werte in Gruppe A (2,5 ± 0,2 mm) als in Gruppe B (1,00 ± 0,3 mm) und höhere KMB-Werte in Gruppe A (2,5 ± 0,2 mm) als in Gruppe B (2,0 ± 0,3 mm). Schlussfolgerungen: Die im vorliegenden Artikel beschriebene VSRF-Technik ist ein zuverlässiges chirurgisches Verfahren zur Implantatfreilegung. Wird diese Technik indikationsgemäß und nach einem minimalinvasiven Protokoll angewendet, liefert sie im Gegensatz zu anderen konventionellen Freilegungstechniken ein größeres Weichgewebevolumen um Implantate. Dies wirkt sich günstig auf die Gesundheit, Ästhetik, Funktion und langfristige Stabilität des periimplantären Gewebes aus.

Implant position and soft tissue thickness have a direct influence on implant abutment design. The goal is to place the implant in the optimal spatial position to maintain the adjacent bone and soft tissues. When the implant is not placed ideally, prosthetic variations to abutments and restorations must be made, which may limit the esthetic appearance of the final restoration or alter the biologic environment of the bone and tissues. This article illustrates and explains the effect of different implant positions on the emergence profile design in order to assist the clinician with treatment planning and selection in various clinical situations.

New digital tools facilitating data acquisition, team communication, computer-assisted diagnostics, and treatment planning as well as the design and fabrication of restorations, guides, stents and devices in general have fundamentally altered key clinical and laboratory steps. The number of new technologies and the amount of new equipment used today to acquire patient data, the software to manipulate this data, and the machines to manufacture devices from it drastically increases all the time, as do the challenges of integrating these systems into a feasible, realistic, and practical workflow. Creating a simple complete digital workflow is key to taking advantage of these digital opportunities and offering their benefits to all patients. Making digital workflows the routine rather than the exception is fundamentally important in order to grow a dental practice in this new environment. This article presents a new complete digital workflow that changes and improves the process of treating a comprehensive case from diagnostics to execution and maintenance.

Neue digitale Möglichkeiten für die Datenakquise, Kommunikation im Team, computergestützte Diagnostik und Behandlungsplanung sowie Design und Herstellung von Restaurationen, Schablonen, Schienen und Apparaturen im Allgemeinen haben zu grundlegenden Veränderungen bei den zentralen klinischen und zahntechnischen Arbeitsschritten geführt. Täglich erhöht sich die Anzahl neuer Techniken und Geräte, die mittlerweile für die Erhebung von Patientendaten eingesetzt werden. Es gibt stetig neue Software für die Verarbeitung dieser Daten und es entstehen neue Geräte, die anhand dieser Daten Restaurationen und Apparaturen herstellen. Damit wachsen jedoch auch die Herausforderungen, diese Systeme in sinnvolle, realistische und praktikable Arbeitsabläufe einzubinden. Die Etablierung eines einfachen volldigitalen Workflows ist der Schlüssel dazu, die digitalen Möglichkeiten sinnvoll und zum Vorteil der Patienten einzusetzen. Um eine Zahnarztpraxis vor diesem neuen Hintergrund erfolgreich zu führen, müssen digitale Workflows von der Ausnahme zur Regel gemacht werden. In diesem Artikel wird ein neuer volldigitaler Workflow vorgestellt, um das Management komplexer Fälle von der Diagnostik über die Behandlung bis zur Nachsorge zu verändern und verbessern.