Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the tensile strength of five different thicknesses of two resin cements placed between two titanium surfaces, before and after ageing. Materials and Methods: One hundred titanium 5 grade models composed of two surfaces simulating a semiprecision attachment for overdenture and its housing in the framework, were used. Samples were cemented using two different resin cements (SoloCem and OT-Cem). Five groups representing five different cement thicknesses (from 50 to 250μm) were created by varying the housing diameter. A half of the sample underwent to a tensile strength test 24h after luting, while the other half after 30000 thermic cycles from 5°C to 55°C. Shapiro-Wilk and ANOVA with post-hoc tests were performed to relate the tensile strength to the variables: cement type, thermal ageing and cement thickness (p <0.05).  
Results: Statistical differences were found between the cements both at T0 and T1; the mean values of tensile strength of SoloCem were three times higher than those of OT-Cem. The thermic cycles determined a reduction of the tensile force values for both cements; statistical evidence was found only for the SoloCem except for the 100μm thickness group. Significant differences were also found between the cement thicknesses of both cements, with 50µm and 100μm expressed the best tensile strength. Most of the fractures were of cohesive nature. Conclusion: SoloCem showed a higher tensile strength than OT-Cem but has been more stressed by the ageing. For each group the cement thickness influenced the tensile strength values with an inverse relationship.